(PS) Zhai v. Markstein Beverage Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 31, 20202:19-cv-01980California2,326 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANN ZHAI, No. 2:19-cv-1980 JAM DB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER MARKSTEIN BEVERAGE COMPANY, et al., 15 Defendants. 17 Plaintiff Ann Zhai proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending before the court are plaintiff’s complaint and motion to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF Nos. 1 & 2.) Therein, plaintiff complains about being injured in a traffic accident. The court is required to screen complaints brought by parties proceeding in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2); see also Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1129 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc). Here, plaintiff’s complaint is deficient. Accordingly, for the reasons stated below, plaintiff’s complaint will be dismissed and plaintiff will be granted leave to file an amended complaint. //// I. Plaintiff’s Application to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.