Robertson
(HC) Cleveland v. Robertson
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EUREKA DIVISION 4 PIERRE CLEVELAND, Case No. 20-cv-00300-RMI Plaintiff, □□ ORDER OF TRANSFER Re: Dkt. Nos. 1, 6 SUPERIOR COURT, Defendant. 10 This is a habeas case filed pro se by a state prisoner. Petitioner challenges a conviction 12 || obtained in the Sacramento County Superior Court. Sacramento County is in the venue of the || United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. Petitioner is incarcerated in this 14 || district. Venue for a habeas action is proper in either the district of confinement or the district of a || conviction. See 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). Petitions challenging a conviction are preferably heard in the district of conviction. See Habeas L.R. 2254-3(a); see also Laue v. Nelson, 279 F. Supp. 265, 266 (N.D. Cal. 1968). Because Petitioner was convicted in the Eastern District, this case is || TRANSFERRED to the…