Rojas

(PC) Martinez v. Rojas

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 1, 20201:16-cv-01467California826 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ANTONIO MARTINEZ, Case No. 1:16-cv-01467-DAD-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY PENDING

v. RESOLUTION OF MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON THE ISSUE OF

ROJAS, et al., EXHAUSTION (ECF No. 61) Defendants.

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO MODIFY

DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING ORDER (ECF No. 67) 16 Plaintiff Antonio Martinez (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s second amended complaint against Defendant Rojas for deliberate indifference in violation of the Eighth Amendment. On September 10, 2019, Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment on the ground that Plaintiff failed to properly exhaust his available administrative remedies with respect to the allegations asserted in this action. (ECF No. 52.) Following multiple…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.