Tafoya

Tafoya v. City of Hanford

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 1, 20201:20-cv-00010California422 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHRISTOPHER TAFOYA, Case No. 1:20-cv-00010-LJO-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF THE

COURT TO ASSIGN THIS ACTION TO A

v. DISTRICT JUDGE FOR PUPOSES OF

CLOSING THE CASE AND ADJUST

CITY OF HANFORD, et al., DOCKET TO REFLECT DISMISSAL UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a) Defendants. (ECF No. 8) 16 Plaintiff Christopher Tafoya, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 21, 2020, Plaintiff’s complaint was screened and it was found not to state a cognizable claim. Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint on February 13, 2020. Plaintiff’s first amended complaint was screened on March 6, 2020. The first amended complaint was found not to state a claim and Plaintiff was to file an amended complaint within thirty days. On March 30, 2020, Plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. “[U]nder Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), ‘a plaintiff has…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.