(PS) Moore v. County of Sacramento, Dept.of Child, Family and Adult Services
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 OTIS T. MOORE, and No. 2:19-cv-844-JAM-KJN PS
KRISTINA A. MOORE,
ORDER Plaintiffs, 13 v.
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO,
DEPARTMENT OF CHILD, FAMILY AND ADULT SERVICES, et. al. 16 Defendants. 17 On March 5, 2020, defendants filed a motion to dismiss on the grounds that plaintiffs’ complaint fails to state any claim for relief. (ECF No. 23.) Defendants noticed its motion for a hearing to take place on April 9, 2020. (Id.) Pursuant to this Court’s Local Rules, Plaintiff was obligated to file and serve a written opposition or statement of non-opposition to the pending motion at least fourteen (14) days prior to the hearing date: i.e. March 26, 2020. See E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(c) (“Opposition, if any, to the granting of the motion shall be in writing and shall be filed and served not less than fourteen (14) days preceding the noticed (or continued) hearing date. A responding party who has no opposition to the granting of the motion shall serve and file