Rivers

Rivers v. Wright

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 1, 20201:19-cv-00916California1,906 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SHERMARRIE RIVERS, Case No. 1:19-cv-00916-DAD-BAM Plaintiff FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION

v. WITH PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO

STATE A CLAIM

DONECIA WRIGHT, et al., (Doc. No. 16) Defendants.

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

17 I. Background Plaintiff Shermarrie Rivers (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil action. (Doc. No. 1.) On October 8, 2019, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) and granted her leave to file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days. (Doc. No. 7.) Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, filed on March 27, 2020, is currently before the Court for screening. (Doc. No. 16.) II. Screening Requirement The Court screens complaints brought by persons proceeding in pro se and in forma pauperis. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Plaintiff’s complaint, or any portion thereof, is subject to 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.