Le

(PS) Hanson v. Le

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 1, 20202:19-cv-00955California392 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL L. HANSON, No. 2:19-cv-955-TLN-EFB PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS DIN NGOC LE, individually and dba D&V 96 Cent Store Plus; VAN THI TROUNG, individually and dba D&V 96 Cent Store Plus, 16 Defendants.

18 On February 13, 2020, the court the court screened plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Because plaintiff’s allegations could not be reconciled with judicially noticeable records1, plaintiff was ordered to show cause, by no later than February 27, 2020, why this action should not be dismissed as frivolous. ECF No. 7. He was also admonished that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Id. The deadline has passed, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order to show cause. 26 Plaintiff alleged that his rights under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act were violated when he visited defendants’ business in February 2018. ECF…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.