(HC)Kakowski

(HC)Kakowski v. Pollard

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 1, 20202:20-cv-00549California1,750 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRIAN KAKOWSKI, No. 2:20-cv-00549 GGH P Petitioner, v. ORDER MARCUS POLLARD, Warden, Respondent. 16 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding in pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis. Examination of the affidavit reveals petitioner is unable to afford the costs of this action. Accordingly, leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Exhaustion The exhaustion of state court remedies is a prerequisite to the granting of a petition for writ of habeas corpus. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(1). If exhaustion is to be waived, it must be waived explicitly by respondents’ counsel. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(3). A waiver of exhaustion, thus, may not be implied or inferred. A petitioner satisfies the exhaustion requirement by providing the highest state court with a full and fair opportunity to consider all…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.