Lizarraga

(HC) Wilhelm v. Lizarraga

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 2, 20201:19-cv-00841California713 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEVE WILHELM, No. 1:19-cv-00841-NONE-JDP Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS

v. PETITION J. A. LIZARRAGA, (Doc. No. 15) Respondent. 16 Petitioner Steve Wilhelm, a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this action, seeks a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Doc. No. 4.) This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 10, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that the pending petition be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. (Doc. No. 15.) On March 27, 2020, petitioner filed objections to the findings and recommendations. (Doc. No. 16.) In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.