(HC) Stribling v. Clark

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 2, 20201:19-cv-00834California775 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AARON LAMONT STRIBLING, Case No. 1:19-cv-00834-NONE-JDP Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS

v. PETITION K. CLARK, (Doc. No. 11) Respondent. 16 Petitioner Aaron Lamont Stribling, a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this action, seeks a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Doc. No. 6.) This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On February 28, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that the pending petition be dismissed for failure to state a cognizable claim for federal habeas relief. (Doc. No. 11.) The findings and recommendations were served on petitioner and contained notice that objections thereto were due within fourteen (14) days. (Id.) The time for filing objections has passed and petitioner has failed to do…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.