Sherman

(PC) Harris v. Sherman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 2, 20201:19-cv-01207California3,589 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CALVIN HARRIS, Case No. 1:19-cv-01207-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE TO

v. ACTION SHERMAN, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR

Defendant. FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM, FAILURE

TO OBEY COURT ORDERS, AND FAILURE

TO PROSECUTE (ECF Nos. 8, 10) FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 19 I. Background Plaintiff Calvin Harris (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On January 23, 2020, the Court issued a screening order granting Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint or a notice of voluntary dismissal within thirty…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.