Bibbs

(PC) Denton v. Bibbs

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 2, 20201:19-cv-00316California7,046 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 RAYMOND H. DENTON, Case No. 1:19-cv-00316-DAD-EPG (PC) 8 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION

v.

PROCEED ON PLAINTIFF’S CLAIM

S. BIBBS, et al., AGAINST DEFENDANTS S. BIBBS,

LIEUTENANT J. ANDERSON, LIEUTENANT

T. COSTA, AND ASSOCIATE WARDEN R. Defendants. CHAVEZ FOR RETALIATION IN VIOLATION OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT, AND THAT

ALL OTHER CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS BE

DISMISSED

15 (ECF NO. 9)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS 18 Raymond H. Denton (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 8, 2019, Plaintiff filed a complaint. (ECF No. 1). The Court screened the complaint and found that Plaintiff stated a cognizable claim against Defendant S. Bibbs for retaliation in violation of the First Amendment, but failed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.