Rimbach

(PC) Allen v. Rimbach

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 2, 20201:18-cv-01653California985 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KEVIN ALLEN, ) Case No.: 1:18-cv-01653-NONE-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S SECOND v. ) MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF

COURT’S PRIOR ORDERS DENYING

S. RIMBACH, et.al., ) APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL ) Defendants. ) (ECF No. 40) ) ) ) )

Plaintiff Kevin Allen is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s second motion for reconsideration of the Court’s prior orders denying his requests for appointment of counsel, filed April 1, 2020. (ECF No. 40.) I. DISCUSSION Reconsideration motions are committed to the discretion of the trial court. Rodgers v. Watt, 722 F.2d 456, 460 (9th Cir. 1983) (en banc); Combs v. Nick Garin Trucking, 825 F.2d 437, 441 (D.C. Cir.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.