Palacios

(PC) Singanonh v. Palacios

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 3, 20201:18-cv-00763California2,811 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TIENGKHAM SINGANONH, 1:18-cv-00763-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER

vs. ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT FOR

FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM, WITH

PALACIOS, et al., LEAVE TO AMEND (ECF No. 1.) Defendants.

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE TO FILE

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

17 I. BACKGROUND Tiengkham Singanonh (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 24, 2018, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action, which is now before the court for screening. (ECF No. 1.) 28 U.S.C. § 1915. At the time of the events at issue in the Complaint Plaintiff was a federal pretrial detainee in custody at the Fresno County Jail. II. SCREENING REQUIREMENT The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.