Palacios
(PC) Singanonh v. Palacios
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 3, 20201:18-cv-00763California2,811 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
TIENGKHAM SINGANONH, 1:18-cv-00763-GSA-PC
Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER
vs. ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT FOR
FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM, WITH
PALACIOS, et al., LEAVE TO AMEND (ECF No. 1.) Defendants.
THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE TO FILE
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
17 I. BACKGROUND Tiengkham Singanonh (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 24, 2018, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action, which is now before the court for screening. (ECF No. 1.) 28 U.S.C. § 1915. At the time of the events at issue in the Complaint Plaintiff was a federal pretrial detainee in custody at the Fresno County Jail. II. SCREENING REQUIREMENT The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of…