O'Reilly

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DE’VON-SAMUEL JAMES No. 2:18-cv-1827-TLN-EFB P

SINGLETON PERKINS,

12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v.

D. BAUGHMAN, et al.,

15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 20, 2020, the court determined that plaintiff’s second amended complaint had alleged, for screening purposes, viable Eighth Amendment claims of deliberate indifference to medical needs against defendants O’Reilly and Soltanian but had not alleged any viable claims against defendant Baughman. ECF No. 18. The court informed plaintiff he could proceed with the claims against defendants O’Reilly and Soltanian or file an amended complaint within 30 days. Id. Plaintiff has elected to proceed only with the claim against defendants O’Reilly and Soltanian. See ECF No. 19. ///// ///// 28 Accordingly, IT IS RECOMMENDED that plaintiff’s claims against defendant …