Hartwick

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LONNIE DONNELL PERKINS, No. 2:18-cv-3156-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

F. HARTWICK, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 10, 2020, the court determined that plaintiff’s complaint had alleged, for screening purposes, a viable Eighth Amendment claim against defendant Hartwick, but had not alleged any viable claims against any other defendant. ECF No. 11. The court informed plaintiff he could proceed with the claim against defendant Hartwick or file an amended complaint within 30 days. Id. Plaintiff has elected to proceed only with the claim against defendant Hartwick. See ECF No. 14. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall randomly assign a United States District Judge to this case. ///// ///// 28 Further, IT IS RECOMMENDED that plaintiffs…