Avila

(PC) Sealy v. Avila

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 3, 20202:19-cv-01205California329 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FLOYD SEALY, No. 2:19-cv-1205-JAM-EFB P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AVILA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 10, 2020, the court determined that plaintiff’s complaint had alleged, for screening purposes, viable claims against defendants Amarillas, Simmons, Avila, Giardino, Her, and Rocke, but had not alleged any viable claims against defendant Miller. ECF No. 18. The court informed plaintiff he could proceed with the claims against defendants Amarillas, Simmons, Avila, Giardino, Her, and Rocke or file an amended complaint within 30 days. Id. Plaintiff has elected to proceed only with the claim against defendants Amarillas, Simmons, Avila, Giardino, Her, and Rocke. See ECF No. 19. ///// ///// ///// 28 Accordingly, IT IS RECOMMENDED that plaintiff’s claims against…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.