Patino

Patino v. County of Merced

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 6, 20201:18-cv-01468California341 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 ELENOR SKYE VILLANUEVA PATINO CASE NO. 1:18-CV-01468-AWI-SAB et al., 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER v. (Doc. No. 42) COUNTY OF MERCED et al., 13 Defendants. 14 Plaintiffs Elenor Patino and Lillyanna Patino stipulated with Defendants California Forensic Medical Group, Inc., Jessica Aguilar, Brandon Boggs, and Amber Nunes to dismiss one of Plaintiffs’ four causes of action — namely, the second cause of action for violation of California Government Code § 845.6 — against California Forensic Medical Group, Inc., Jessica Aguilar, Brandon Boggs, and Amber Nunes. See Doc. No. 42 (stipulation and proposed order). According to these parties, the stipulation was made pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and these parties ask the Court to issue an order adopting the stipulation pursuant to Rule 41. The stipulation neither encompasses nor was agreed to by Defendants County of Merced, Vernon…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.