Kang

Kang v. Credit Bureau Connection, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 7, 20201:18-cv-01359California5,616 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRESNO DIVISION

3 4 SUNG GON KANG, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, Case No. 1:18-cv-01359-AWI-SKO Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER

CREDIT BUREAU CONNECTION,

INC.,

9 (Doc. 56) Defendant. 10 11 12 This matter is before the Court on Defendant Credit Bureau Connection, Inc.’s motion for 13 protective order filed on February 19, 2020. (Doc. 56.) Plaintiff filed an opposition on March 14 4, 2020, (Doc. 57), and Defendant filed a reply brief on March 11, 2020, (Doc. 58). The Court 15 reviewed the parties’ papers and all supporting material and found the matter suitable for 16 decision without oral argument. The hearing set for March 18, 2020, was therefore vacated. 17 (See Doc. 62.) For the reasons set forth below, the motion is denied.

I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND

19 A. Procedural Background

On October 2, 2018, Plaintiff filed this putative class action against Defendant alleging violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”), 15…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.