Diaz

(PC) Hunt v. Diaz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 6, 20201:19-cv-00504California903 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARK HUNT, No. 1:19-cv-00504-DAD-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION

D. DIAZ, et al., (Doc. No. 26) Defendants.

16 Plaintiff Mark Hunt is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On September 19, 2019, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that plaintiff’s due process claim be dismissed for failure to state a cognizable claim and this action proceed on plaintiff’s excessive force claim against defendants D. Diaz, A. Velasquez, J. Brainard, G. Solorio, and K. Reyes. (Doc. No. 21.) The findings and recommendations were served on plaintiff, and plaintiff failed to file objections ///// 26 In the present motion, plaintiff asks how dismissal of his due…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.