CCWF
(PC) Flores v. CCWF
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ENID MARIE FLORES, Case No. 1:19-cv-01681-AWI-JDP Plaintiff, ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE
WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE
v. DISMISSED AS DUPLICATIVE OF CASE 1:19-cv-01509-NONE-JLT CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL WOMEN’S FACILITY, et al., THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE 15 Defendants.
17 Plaintiff Enid Marie Flores is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this action. 18 Plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this action on November 12, 2019. ECF No. 1. As it 19 appears that plaintiff filed a complaint against the same defendants based on the same allegations 20 in Flores v. Cal. Corr. Women’s Facility, No. 1:19-cv-01509 at ECF No. 1, the court will order 21 plaintiff to show cause why this case should not be dismissed as duplicative. 22 Duplicative lawsuits filed by a plaintiff proceeding in forma pauperis are subject to 23 dismissal as either frivolous or malicious under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). See, e.g., Cato v. United 24 States, 70 F.3d 1103, 1105 n.2 (9th Cir.…