(PC) Hogue v. Sacramento Police Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 7, 20202:17-cv-00434California403 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRIAN HOGUE, No. 2:17-cv-0434-MCE-EFB P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SACRAMENTO POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 On January 7, 2020, the City of Sacramento filed a motion to compel, ECF No. 25, and on February 5, 2020, the City of Sacramento filed a motion to compel deposition or for terminating sanctions, ECF No. 26. The time for acting passed, and plaintiff failed to file an opposition or otherwise respond to either motion. On February 14, 2020, and March 6, 2020, the court warned plaintiff that failure to respond to the motions could result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). The court also granted plaintiff a 21-day extension of time to respond to each motion. ECF Nos. 27, 28. The time for acting has once again passed and plaintiff has not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.