Baughman

(PC) Womack v. Baughman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 6, 20202:17-cv-02708California394 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RODNEY JEROME WOMACK, No. 2:17-cv-02708-TLN-KJN Plaintiff, v. ORDER DAVID BAUGHMAN, Warden, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Rodney Jerome Womack (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On February 25, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 32.) On March 12, 2020, Plaintiff filed Objections to the Findings and Recommendations. (ECF No. 33.) This Court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to which objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.