Insixiengmay

Insixiengmay v. Hyatt Corp.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 7, 20202:18-cv-02993California923 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

J. Scott Carr (SBN 136706) scarr@kcozlaw.com Abigail Stecker Romero (SBN 284534) aromero@kcozlaw.com

KABAT CHAPMAN & OZMER LLP

333 S. Grand Ave, Suite 2225 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: (213) 493-3980 Facsimile: (404) 400-7333 6 Attorneys for Defendant HYATT CORPORATION d/b/a HYATT REGENCY SACRAMENTO 7 (erroneously sued as both “Hyatt Corporation” and “Hyatt Corporation d/b/a Hyatt Regency Sacramento) Galen T. Shimoda (SBN 226752) attorney@shimodalaw.com Justin P. Rodriguez (SBN 278275) jrodriguez@shimodalaw.com Brittany V. Berzin (SBN 325121) bberzin@shimodalaw.com. 12 Shimoda Law Corp. 9401 E. Stockton Blvd., Suite 120, Elk Grove, CA 95624 Telephone: (916) 525-0716 Facsimile: (916) 760-3733

Attorneys for Plaintiff Janice Insixiengmay, individually and on behalf of all others similarly 16 situated

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JANICE INSIXIENGMAY, individually and Case No. 2:18-cv-02993-TLN-DB on behalf of all others similarly situated, 21 Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND ORDER TO STAY DISCOVERY DUE TO COVID-19 vs. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.