Cota

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALLEN HAMMLER, No. 2:19-cv-1423-JAM-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER E. COTA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In accordance with the order filed March 24, 2020, plaintiff may either proceed with his potentially cognizable First Amendment retaliation claims against defendants Cota, Burnes, Hubbard, Case, and Salcedo only or he may amend his complaint to attempt to cure the defects in the claims that were dismissed with leave to amend, namely: (1) plaintiff’s substantive First Amendment claims against Hubbard for preventing him from speaking with a psychologist and against Tumacder; (2) plaintiff’s First Amendment retaliation claims against Mccarvel, Tumacder, Garza, and Rodriguez; and (3) plaintiff’s substantive due process, procedural due process, equal protection, and “deliberate indifference” claims. He may not, however, change the…