(PS) Selck v. Kaiser Permanente

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 7, 20202:19-cv-00977California614 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MORREY SELCK, No. 2:19-cv-977-JAM-EFB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

KAISER PERMANENTE, Defendant. 16 The court previously issued an order setting a status (pretrial scheduling) conference for February 19, 2020. The order directed plaintiff to complete service of process on the defendant within 90 days and to serve a copy of the order concurrently with service of the summons and complaint. The order also directed the parties to file status reports fourteen days prior to the scheduling conference. ECF No. 9. Plaintiff did not timely file a status report, nor did he file a proof of service demonstrating that defendant was properly served. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l)(l) (requiring that proof of service be made to the court). Accordingly, the status conference was continued, and plaintiff was ordered to show cause, by no later than March 25, 2020, why this case should not be dismissed for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.