Hearn

(PC) Thorpe v. Hearn

Caution
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 7, 20202:19-cv-01974California613 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RENELL THORPE, No. 2:19-cv-1974 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER C. HEARN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court are plaintiff’s objections to his noticed deposition. (ECF No. 32.) In his objections, plaintiff requests that his deposition be postponed by ninety days. For the reasons stated herein, plaintiff’s objections are without merit. Plaintiff’s request to postpone his deposition is denied. Plaintiff alleges that the deposition notice contains a request for production of documents. Plaintiff alleges that he did not receive thirty days notice for the request for production of documents, as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 34. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(1) requires that a party seeking a deposition give “reasonable notice” of the deposition. When a deposition…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.