Sanchez

Sanchez v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 6, 20202:19-cv-01545California2,165 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CRYSTAL R. SANCHEZ, No. 2:19-cv-01545-MCE-AC Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO,

SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF’S

DEPARTMENT, and ALBEE, Defendants. 17 Plaintiff Crystal R. Sanchez (“Plaintiff”) brings this suit against Defendants County of Sacramento (“County”), Sacramento County Sheriff’s Department (“Sheriff’s Department”), and Deputy Albee (collectively, “Defendants”), stating claims based on an allegedly false arrest and impoundment of her vehicle. In response to Plaintiff’s Complaint, Defendants filed an Answer asserting eight affirmative defenses, five of which Plaintiff now moves to strike. ECF Nos. 7–8. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.1 /// /// 27 1 Because oral argument would not be of material assistance, the Court ordered this matter submitted on the briefs. E.D. Local Rule 230(g). BACKGROUND2…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.