Pfieffer

(HC) Fickenworth v. Pfieffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 6, 20202:20-cv-00199California1,226 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GARRISON THOMAS FICKENWORTH, No. 2:20-cv-0199 AC P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

CHRISTIAN PFIEFFER, WARDEN, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks habeas relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 and has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. See ECF Nos. 1, 5, 7. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. For the reasons stated below, the undersigned recommends that this action be summarily dismissed pursuant to Rule 4 of the Habeas Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. I. IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION Petitioner has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). See ECF No. 7. Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. II. RELEVANT PROCEDURAL HISTORY On January 23, 2020, petitioner filed a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.