Santuro

(PC) Quair v. Santuro

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 8, 20201:20-cv-00395California1,007 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID SABINO QUAIR, III, Case No. 1:20-cv-00395-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE TO

v. ACTION

SANTURO, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

Defendants. FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS BE DENIED

16 (ECF No. 7)

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

18 Plaintiff David Sabino Quair, III (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff initiated this action on March 12, 2020, in the Sacramento Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. (ECF No. 1.) This action was transferred to the Fresno Division on March 18, 2020. (ECF No. 3.) On March 19, 2020, the Court ordered Plaintiff to submit a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee to proceed with this action. (ECF No. 5.) Currently before…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.