Spearman

(PC) Romero v. Spearman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 8, 20202:18-cv-01590California3,335 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHARLES ROMERO, No. 2:18-cv-1590 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER M.E. SPEARMAN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. ECF Nos. 1, 2. 5. The matter was referred to this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. For the reasons stated herein, plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. Plaintiff will also be given the opportunity to amend the complaint. I. IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). See ECF Nos. 2, 5. Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. Plaintiff is required to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 1915(b)(1). By this order, plaintiff will be assessed an initial partial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.