Rubio
Rubio v. Lovan
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARY ZAMORA RUBIO, No. 2:19-cv-02025-MCE-AC Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ANDRE LOVAN and ROBERT GOLD, Defendants. 16 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Mary Zamora Rubio’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Amend the Complaint. ECF No. 7. Plaintiff seeks to make the following changes to her Complaint: (1) change Defendant “Robert Gold” to “Roger Gold”; (2) add the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”) as an additional defendant; and (3) add supplemental state law claims for sexual assault and battery, negligent supervision, hiring, training, and retention, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and violations of the Unruh Act against all Defendants. Id. at 3. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s Motion is GRANTED.1 /// /// 27 1 Because oral argument would not be of material assistance, the Court ordered this matter submitted on the briefs. E.D. Local Rule 230(g). …