Rubio

Rubio v. Lovan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 8, 20202:19-cv-02025California1,495 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARY ZAMORA RUBIO, No. 2:19-cv-02025-MCE-AC Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ANDRE LOVAN and ROBERT GOLD, Defendants. 16 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Mary Zamora Rubio’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Amend the Complaint. ECF No. 7. Plaintiff seeks to make the following changes to her Complaint: (1) change Defendant “Robert Gold” to “Roger Gold”; (2) add the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”) as an additional defendant; and (3) add supplemental state law claims for sexual assault and battery, negligent supervision, hiring, training, and retention, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and violations of the Unruh Act against all Defendants. Id. at 3. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s Motion is GRANTED.1 /// /// 27 1 Because oral argument would not be of material assistance, the Court ordered this matter submitted on the briefs. E.D. Local Rule 230(g). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.