(PS) Jones v. Liberty Mutual

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 8, 20202:19-cv-02049California607 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DYLAN LLOYD JONES, No. 2:19-cv-02049-MCE-KJN Plaintiff, ORDER v. LIBERTY MUTUAL, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Dylan Lloyd Jones (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings the instant action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On January 30, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which were served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. (ECF No. 32.) On February 10, 2020, Plaintiff filed Objections to the Findings and Recommendations. (ECF No. 33.) On February 21, 2020, Defendants filed a Reply to Plaintiff’s objections. (ECF No. 35.) /// /// /// /// This Court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to which objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.