Alvarez
Alvarez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN ALVAREZ, No. 2:15-cv-00943-TLN-DB Plaintiff, v. ORDER WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al., Defendants. 16 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff John Alvarez’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF Nos. 42–45), Defendant Wells Fargo Bank’s (“Defendant”) Cross- Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 46), and Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 67). All motions have been fully briefed. (ECF Nos. 48, 50, 51, 52, 71, 76.) For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is DENIED, Defendant’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction is DENIED. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND1 Plaintiff resides at 7625 Zilli Drive in Tracy, California, the real property at issue in this matter (“the Property”). (ECF No. 47, Statement of Undisputed Facts (“SUF”), at ¶ 1.) On April