(HC) Harris v. Sacramento County Superior Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RODRICK HARRIS, No. 2:19-cv-02413-TLN-KJN Petitioner, v. ORDER SACRAMENTO COUNTY SUPERIOR

COURT,

15 Respondents.

17 Rodrick Harris (“Petitioner”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On January 13, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Petitioner and which contained notice to Petitioner that any objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 7.) Petitioner has not filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations. Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v.…