Kamen
(PC) Pittman v. Kamen
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 8, 20201:18-cv-01316California4,570 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
EDWARD SIMEON PITTMAN, 1:18-cv-01316-DAD-GSA-PC
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,
RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE
v. PROCEED WITH PLAINTIFF’S MEDICAL
CLAIM AGAINST DEFENDANT KAMEN,
DR. KAMEN, et al., AND RETALIATION CLAIMS AGAINST
DEFENDANTS KAMEN AND HICKMAN,
Defendants. THAT ALL OTHER CLAIMS AND
DEFENDANTS BE DISMISSED BASED ON
PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO STATE A
CLAIM
OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN
FOURTEEN DAYS I. BACKGROUND Edward Simeon Pittman (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 25, 2018, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. (ECF No. 1.) On September 16, 2019, the court screened the Complaint and issued an order requiring Plaintiff to either (1) File a First Amended Complaint, or (2)…