Kamen

(PC) Pittman v. Kamen

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 8, 20201:18-cv-01316California4,570 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDWARD SIMEON PITTMAN, 1:18-cv-01316-DAD-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE

v. PROCEED WITH PLAINTIFF’S MEDICAL

CLAIM AGAINST DEFENDANT KAMEN,

DR. KAMEN, et al., AND RETALIATION CLAIMS AGAINST

DEFENDANTS KAMEN AND HICKMAN,

Defendants. THAT ALL OTHER CLAIMS AND

DEFENDANTS BE DISMISSED BASED ON

PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO STATE A

CLAIM

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

FOURTEEN DAYS I. BACKGROUND Edward Simeon Pittman (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 25, 2018, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. (ECF No. 1.) On September 16, 2019, the court screened the Complaint and issued an order requiring Plaintiff to either (1) File a First Amended Complaint, or (2)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.