(PS) Hunt v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 8, 20202:20-cv-00109California535 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RUSSELL K. HUNT, No. 2:20-cv-00109-TLN-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Russell K. Hunt (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On February 28, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. (ECF No. 3.) On March 11, 2020, Plaintiff filed Objections to the Findings and Recommendations. (ECF No. 4.) This Court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to which objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.