Moore

(PC) Van Gessel v. Moore

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 9, 20201:18-cv-01478California672 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER ALLEN VAN GESSEL, No. 1:18-cv-01478-DAD-GSA (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

DR. THOMAS MOORE, et al., CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS Defendants. (Doc. No. 16) 16 17 Plaintiff Christopher Allen Van Gessel is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens vs. Six Unknown Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) and the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b). The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On February 25, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that this action proceed only against defendants Dr. Moore, Physician’s Assistant (“PA”) Altuire, and PA Ballesil on plaintiff’s claims of medical ///// ///// ///// indifference under the Eighth Amendment and medical…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.