Burns

(PC) Hammler v. Burns

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 9, 20201:20-cv-00489California1,318 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALLEN HAMMLER, Case No. 1:20-cv-00489-SAB (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO

SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION

v. SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

FAILURE TO PAY THE FILING FEE

MR. J. BURNS, et al.,

FOURTEEN DAY DEADLINE

Defendants.

16 Allen Hammler (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner, is appearing pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed a complaint and a motion to file a new case in this action on April 6, 2020. Plaintiff did not pay the filing fee or submit an application to proceed in this action in forma pauperis. Plaintiff’s motion states that he is subject to a prefiling order. However, Plaintiff is subject to a prefiling order in the Southern District of California due to being found to be a vexatious litigant. See Hammler v. Alvarez, No. 3:18-cv-00326-AJB-WVG (S.D. Cal. Aug. 13, 2019). Plaintiff does not include a copy of the order in his current filing. The Court does not find a prefiling order in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.