Jones

(PC) Hunter v. Jones

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 9, 20202:19-cv-02340California372 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 10 DAVID SAMPSON HUNTER, et al., No. 2:19-cv-2340 DB P 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SCOTT JONES, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 Plaintiff is a county inmate proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action was initially filed by plaintiff and another inmate. By order dated February 7, 2020, the court severed the plaintiff’s claims and dismissed the complaint. (ECF No. 11.) Plaintiff was directed each plaintiff to file his own complaint and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis within thirty days. Plaintiff was warned that failure to comply with the court’s order would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Those thirty days have passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or application to proceed in forma pauperis. Accordingly, the court will recommend that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court orders. //// //// //// //// …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.