Pfeiffer
(PC) Struggs v. Pfeiffer
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 10, 20201:18-cv-01336California774 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CEDRIC LYNN STRUGGS, 1:18-cv-01336-NONE-GSA-PC
Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS
ACTION SHOULD NOT BE
vs. DISMISSED AS BARRED BY HECK V.
HUMPHRY, 512 U.S. 477 (1994) AND
C. PFEIFFER, et al., EDWARDS v. BALISOK, 520 U.S. 641 (1997). Defendants.
(ECF No. 23.)
30-DAY DEADLINE
Cedric Lynn Struggs (“Plaintiff”) is a sta te prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 27, 2018, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action. (ECF No. 1.) On September 25, 2019, the court screened the Complaint and dismissed it for failure to state a claim and violation of Rule 18 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, with leave to amend. (ECF No. 16.) On November 15, 2019, Plaintiff filed the First Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 20.) On November 21, 2019, the court…