(PS) Rubang v. Ally Financial Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GONZALO R. RUBANG, JR., No. 2:19-cv-0154 MCE DB PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ALLY FINANCIAL INC., Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Gonzalo Rubang Jr., is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending before the court are plaintiff’s amended complaint and motion to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF Nos. 2 & 4.) Therein, plaintiff complains about plaintiff’s defective vehicle. The court is required to screen complaints brought by parties proceeding in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2); see also Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1129 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc). Here, plaintiff’s amended complaint is deficient. Accordingly, for the reasons stated below, the undersigned will recommend that plaintiff’s amended complaint be dismissed without further leave to amend. ////…