(PS) Miner v. National Aeronautics & Space Administration

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 10, 20202:19-cv-01576California347 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 POCAHONTAS formerly known as No. 2:19-cv-1576 KJM DB PS

MADIHA MINER

12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v.

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS & SPACE

ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. 17 Plaintiff Madiha Miner is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). By order signed February 21, 2020, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed, and plaintiff was granted leave to file an amended complaint that cured the defects noted in that order. (ECF No. 6.) Plaintiff was granted twenty-eight days from the date of that order to file an amended complaint and was specifically cautioned that the failure to respond to the court’s order in a timely manner would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Id. at 5.) The twenty-eight-day period has expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order in any manner. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.