(PS) Miner v. National Aeronautics & Space Administration
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 POCAHONTAS formerly known as No. 2:19-cv-1576 KJM DB PS
MADIHA MINER
12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v.
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS & SPACE
ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. 17 Plaintiff Madiha Miner is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). By order signed February 21, 2020, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed, and plaintiff was granted leave to file an amended complaint that cured the defects noted in that order. (ECF No. 6.) Plaintiff was granted twenty-eight days from the date of that order to file an amended complaint and was specifically cautioned that the failure to respond to the court’s order in a timely manner would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Id. at 5.) The twenty-eight-day period has expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order in any manner. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY…