Martin

(PS) Estrada v. Martin

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 10, 20202:19-cv-02115California1,903 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FRANK RUDOLPH ESTRADA, No. 2:19–cv–2115–JAM–KJN PS Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE

v. (ECF Nos. 18, 21) MATT MARTIN, et al., Defendants. 16 This action concerns a dispute between Plaintiff Frank Rudolph Estrada, who is proceeding without counsel in this action, and defendants Sandra Reese, a Principal at Woodland–Pioneer High School, Student Resource Officer Hannah Gray, and Sheriff Deputies Matt Martin and Erin Forrester. (ECF No. 1.) Estrada asserts claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for alleged violations of his First, Fourth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights. Defendants now move to dismiss on statute-of-limitations grounds, which Estrada opposes. (ECF Nos. 18, 21, 31.) For the reasons that follow, the Court recommends the motion to dismiss be GRANTED, and Estrada’s claims be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. ///

1 This action proceeds before the undersigned per 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Local Rule…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.