(PC) Gonzales v. Gonzales

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 13, 20201:19-cv-00459California928 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL GONZALES, Case No. 1:19-cv-00459-NONE-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF

v. DEFENDANTS GONZALES AND CENA

FOR FAILURE TO EFFECTUATE SERVICE

GONZALES, et al., OF PROCESS Defendants. (ECF No. 28) 16 Plaintiff Michael Gonzales is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 30, 2019, the Court found that service of Plaintiff’s complaint was appropriate as to Defendants Godinez, Cena, Gonzales, Harry, Villegas, Serato (or Serrato), Gonzalez, Shoemaker, Perez, Willis, Arron, Torres, and Harmon for providing Plaintiff with food tainted with involuntary antipsychotic medication without a Keyhea order in violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. (ECF No. 13.) On January 2, 2020, pursuant to the E-Service pilot program for civil rights cases in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.