Bostanjian

(PC) Haygood v. Bostanjian

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 13, 20201:19-cv-01011California1,965 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7 8 DEON HAYGOOD, Case No. 1:19-cv-01011-EPG (PC) 9 Plaintiff, ORDER ALLOWING PLAINTIFF’S CLAIM FOR

DELIBERATE INDIFFERENCE TO SERIOUS

v. MEDICAL NEEDS IN VIOLATION OF THE

EIGHTH AMENDMENT AGAINST

MARINA BOSTANJIAN, M.D.

DEFENDANT, DR. MARINA BOSTANJIAN TO Defendants. PROCEED 13 (ECF No. 14) 15 Plaintiff, Deon Haygood, (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed his original complaint on July 18, 2019 (ECF No. 1). Following the Court’s screening order, (ECF No. 13), Plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint on February 3, 2020. (ECF No. 14). The Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint and finds that Plaintiff’s claim for deliberate indifference to serious medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment against Defendant Dr. Marina Bostanjian should proceed past the screening stage. I. SCREENING REQUIRMENT …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.