Horne

Horne v. Golden Empire Transit

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 13, 20201:19-cv-01209California1,613 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 MICHAEL HORNE, Case No. 1:19-cv-01209-DAD-EPG 11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE BE v. DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS AND FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM

GOLDEN EMPIRE TRANSIT

14 (ECF No. 1) Defendant.

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

TWENTY-ONE DAYS 17 Plaintiff, Michael Horne (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed the complaint initiating this action on September 3, 2019. (ECF No. 1.) For the reasons described below, the Court recommends that this action be dismissed for being frivolous and for failing to state a claim, without prejudice to the filing of a paid complaint making the same allegations Plaintiff may file objections to these findings and recommendations within twenty-one days from the date of service of this order. I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), in any case in which a plaintiff is proceeding in forma…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.