Najera
(PC) Miller v. Najera
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
STEVEN R. MILLER, Case No. 1:20-cv-00234-JDP
Plaintiff,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS
v. CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED AS
DUPLICATIVE OF CASE NUMBER 1:19-
ALBERT NAJERA, et al.,
CV-01077-AWI-BAM
Defendants.
THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE
14 Plaintiff Steven R. Miller is a federal prisoner proceeding without counsel in this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). A plaintiff has “no right to maintain two separate actions involving the same subject matter at the same time in the same court and against the same defendant.” Walton v. Eaton Corp., 563 F.2d 66, 70 (3d Cir. 1977). To see whether an action is duplicative, we “examine whether the causes of action and relief sought, as well as the parties or privies to the action, are the same.” Adams v. California Dep't of Health Servs., 487 F.3d 684, 689 (9th Cir. 2007). This action appears duplicative of case number 1:19-cv-01077-AWI-BAM—a case…