Odeluga

(PC) Gray v. Odeluga

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 13, 20201:19-cv-00183California2,019 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CURTIS LE’BARRON GRAY, Case No. 1:19-cv-0183-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER TO ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE;

AND

v.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DR. N. ODELUGA, et al., DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Defendants. WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND

FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE

17 Plaintiff has filed a second amended complaint asserting constitutional claims against a 18 governmental employee. (Doc. 15.) Generally, the Court is required to screen complaints brought 19 by inmates seeking relief against a governmental entity or an officer or employee of a governmental 20 entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner 21 has raised claims that are legally “frivolous or malicious,” that fail to state a claim upon which 22 relief may be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such 23 relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), (2). “Notwithstanding any filing fee, or any portion thereof, that 24 may…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.