Jones

(PS) Gonzalez v. Jones

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 13, 20202:15-cv-02448California2,708 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL GONZALEZ, No. 2:15-cv-2448-TLN-KJN Plaintiff, ORDER v. (ECF No. 174) KYLE THOMAS JONES., et al. Defendants. 16 This case concerns plaintiff’s allegations of wrongful revocation of his real estate license, as against individual employees of the Department (“Bureau”) of Real Estate. (See ECF No. 136 at 2.) After five years of litigation in this court, and a decade of parallel litigation in state court, plaintiff requested an additional 150 days to conduct fact-based discovery. (See ECF No. 174.) The operative scheduling order set the non-expert discovery deadline for October 18, 2019. (See ECF No. 136.) Defendants oppose, arguing that, among other reasons, plaintiff has failed to diligently pursue his case. (ECF No. 176.) For the reasons that follow, plaintiff’s motion to reopen discovery is denied.1 /// 26 1 As to defendants’ request to reset the dispositive-motion deadline (ECF No. 172), this issue…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.